Sourcing, Screening & Submission

Candidate Matching Agent

ai

A background agent that scores and ranks candidates against an open job across specialty, license, location, and availability, returning a shortlist with a written rationale for every match so recruiters see why each candidate ranked where they did.

RecruiterSourcing SpecialistCredentialing Specialist
Scored
Every candidate rated against the requisition
4-factor
Specialty, license, location, and availability
Rationale
A written reason attached to each match
Use Case 1

Post-Sourcing Scoring

Trigger: A job's candidate pool needs ranking

1.Read the requisition and candidate pool
2.Score each candidate on specialty and license
3.Score on location and availability
4.Combine into a ranked shortlist
5.Attach a written rationale per candidate
6.Flag license or availability concerns for follow-up

Recruiters get a transparent, ranked shortlist they can trust or override with context.

Use Case 2

Match Explainability

Trigger: A recruiter questions a candidate's rank

1.Surface the four factor scores for the candidate
2.Show which factor drove the ranking
3.Note any license or availability caveat
4.Route credential concerns to credentialing
5.Let the recruiter re-rank with their own context

Ranking decisions are explainable, keeping recruiter trust in the shortlist.

Integrations

Healthcare Staffing Platform (VMS/ATS)
Candidate CRM
Requisition Data
Dashboards & Charts

Industries

healthcare

See It In Action

A sample conversation with this agent

Score the candidate pool for this job.
Reading the requisition and the candidate pool, I score each candidate across specialty fit, license validity for the state, location or willingness to travel, and availability against the start date. The output is a ranked shortlist with a written rationale per candidate—not just a number, but why they ranked there. That lets a recruiter trust the order or override it with context the data doesn't capture.
Just give me the top score, skip the reasons.
I'll lead with the ranking, but I keep the rationale attached because a score without a reason is hard to act on—and easy to mistrust. The top candidate here ranks first on a strong specialty and license match with immediate availability; the reason line tells you that at a glance. If you want a compact view, I can collapse the rationales to one line each rather than drop them.
This candidate's license looks expired to me.
If the pool data shows an expired or lapsing license, that lowers the match and I note it in the rationale rather than ranking them as placement-ready. I score license as a match factor, but I don't verify credentials against primary sources—that's the credentialing agent's job. I'll flag the license concern so it routes to credentialing before this candidate goes forward.