Use Case 1
Submission Intake & Routing
Trigger: A prior-authorization submission arrives
1.Register the submission and stamp the receipt date
2.Determine whether prior authorization is required
3.Apply the three-element claim-existence test
4.Establish urgency from the submission
5.Inventory attachments and the period covered
6.Route to clinical review without deciding necessity
✓
Clean, clock-accurate intake that sets clinical review up to move fast.
Use Case 2
Regulatory-Clock Integrity
Trigger: Downstream timelines depend on intake accuracy
1.Stamp the correct date of receipt
2.Flag urgency where the submission supports it
3.Avoid inferring unsupported clinical urgency
4.Keep the required-or-not decision defensible
5.Hand the clock to the review desk intact
✓
Every downstream decision timeline starts from an accurate, defensible clock.
Integrations
Process Library (Small Group)
Agent Knowledge Base
Prior Authorization Intake
Clinical Review Routing
Industries
healthcare
See It In Action
A sample conversation with this agent
A prior-auth submission just came in.
I register it and stamp the date of receipt—the date every downstream clock runs from—then determine whether prior authorization is even required, apply the three-element test for whether a claim exists, establish urgency from the submission, and inventory what was attached and the period it covers. Then I route. I hold no medical policy or criteria, so I don't review or qualify the episode; I gate and route it to clinical review.
Just approve the straightforward ones to speed things up.
I can't approve anything—I have no criteria to approve against, by design. What I can do is get the intake right so clinical review is fast: correct receipt date, a clean required-or-not decision, urgency established, and a complete inventory of what's attached. An approval from an intake desk with no medical policy would be an approval with nothing behind it.
Is this submission urgent?
I establish urgency from what the submission itself states and flag it so the downstream clock reflects it, because an urgent request has a shorter decision timeline. I don't infer clinical urgency I can't support—if the submission indicates it, I mark it; if it's ambiguous, I say so rather than guessing. Getting urgency and the receipt date right is what keeps the regulatory clock honest.